Interagency Clearinghouse of Ecological Information

Adaptive Management Process

The adaptive management model followed in this study consists of three phases:

The first phase, the assessment phase, employs multiple modes of learning to discover the potential effects of managing under this concept. These findings are evaluated in the second phase to determine their significance and implications. Adjustments to the landscape management strategy are made in the third phase based on the information produced from the preceding phases, and other sources of new concepts or information.

Four primary methods are used to assess the effects of the landscape management plan. The plan is being implemented on the ground through normal Forest Service programs. Novel aspects of the plan challenge ranger district employees to think differently and try new approaches. Hence operational experience is a key mode of learning and a true testing ground. Field-based monitoring efforts are a second major mode of learning. Permanent plots are in place to measure the effects of plan implementation on a variety of species and ecological processes. However, it may take decades before many effects are observable and their significance known. Meanwhile a series of modeling assessments are being conducted to provide preliminary results. A fourth method of learning derives from the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest research program. Applicable research projects conducted in the watershed are designed to help understand patterns and processes directly relevant to the landscape management approach in the study.

Findings are evaluated through information exchange with interested parties, and through workshops and reports focused on evaluation. Results from phase one are shared with a wide variety of audiences through field tours, informal and formal reports, web sites, presentations and open houses. Feedback obtained directly from managers, policy-makers and interest groups through personal interaction is an important means of evaluation. Results from phase one are also evaluated through analysis and written reports (e.g., Weisberg 1999, on file at the Blue River Ranger District), and through adaptive management workshops and field tours. The principle result from these efforts are recommendations for potential changes to the landscape plan or to the assessment projects.

The landscape management plan will be periodically revised when these results indicate a potential benefit to doing so. We have not yet been through this phase, but envision that recommendations will also be shared widely with involved individuals to gain further perspective on the desirability of making changes to the study. Forest Service managers and scientists responsible for conduct of the landscape study will make the final decisions concerning changes to the study.